When Wright Is Wrong: Why Obama Couldn’t Renounce Him
In all the ongoing blah-blah on the news about Obama and his pastor, I haven’t heard any of the TV talking heads address the real reason why Obama can’t disaffiliate himself from the man who may well be his Achilles heel in the presidential race.
During his speech, Obama deftly twirled around the issue as if it were his tango partner on “Dancing with the Stars.” When interviewed, the spokespersons who supposedly represent the black religious community carefully sidestepped it like it’s a landmine only they know exists. Even Obama himself would prefer to appear a liar in the public eye, reversing his earlier avowal that he’d never personally heard Wright’s inflammatory rhetoric, rather than reveal what keeps him tied to the political millstone around his neck.
The truth is that in certain denominational flavors, pastors hold an ungodly amount of spiritual (read: psychological) power over their congregation and to renounce him would be tantamount to renouncing Christ. Although evangelical/fundamentalist/born-again circles would not appreciate the comparison, it’s not unlike how traditional Catholics view the Pope: as a divinely ordained spokesperson to the laity — and the implicit warning is you better not mess with the Almighty’s official DD (Designated Delegate.)
The precept is a very old one. It originates in the Old Testament, when Israel’s kings and prophets were considered irreproachable and unimpeachable by the people — as it cautions in Psalm 105: “Touch not the Lord’s anointed ones.” It was a caveat that the ancient Jews took very seriously. The same idea is further elaborated on in the New Testament with St. Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians in Chapter 4, where it states: “And He Himself appointed some to be apostles, some to be prophets, some to be evangelists, some to be pastors and teachers…for building up the body of Christ until we all reach unity in the faith.” If people believe that all scripture is the inerrant and unchanging word of God to man, then they can’t denounce their pastor, no matter what he says or does. Hey, if it’s God’s hand-picked man, the problem is His and not theirs.
Do I personally think Obama shares Reverend Wright’s racist views? No, I don’t. But he found himself was in a terrible Biblical bind. He’s a politican who wants to get elected. He’s also a Christian who belongs to a church whose beliefs might well seem bizarre and backward to mainstream America. He doesn’t want to lie, but neither can he afford to explain the real reason why he sat for years under a hate-mongering pastor. The solution? Simple! Just dodge the issue by noncommittally stating he “didn’t agree” with everything Wright espoused from the pulpit — and then quickly move on to another subject.
Obama’s campaign slogan may be “Change we can believe in.” But after his bit of Political Speech Strategy 101, the old truism applies more than ever. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
–phoebe kate
Comments(1)